> I do that all the time... typo off the negative, which completely changes the meaning > of your intention... >
Sorry about that, i forgot to add "when you're young and not considering consequences and responsibilities". After all we want to discover the experience sooner, but our impatience leads us to ignore what comes ahead. It's part of growing up.
> Agreed. I would add "giving" as well. Which is to say being unselfish. Most couples I > know (my past relationships included) break up surrounding issues of money, sex, and > time. Basically one of the pair isn't giving the other "enough" of one of the > three... OOOOOooor or one of the pair is demanding too much of one of the three. If > both in the pair were both doing all what they could do be unselfish with the money, > the sex, and the time, then in theory the pair could circumvent the big-three > relationship killers right there. > > Every day put some money in her purse, eat her pussy out, and take care of the kids > so she can have some free time. If she loves you, she'll be doing what she can to > return the generosity... and everybody is happy.
I couldn't have explained it better. Giving is the key of any relationship. We're selfish by nature, even when we share a bed with someone for the first time we're obeying our necessities, so we behave in forms different to what we really are. That's how misunderstandings and false impressions start. That's how i understood why some TV shows touched the "if you love her, just be yourself" theme.
I have the feeling i'll end married with the typical single mom with two kids. But if that happens i hope by then, whoever she is, knows what she wants and needs to give as i do. Otherwise i prefer to still be alone.
|