> That's not how the algorithm works, it does not step over the code blindly like that, > but just like MAME will not lose that string and can emulate it all properly, so can > that algorithm too, it is pretty much the same thing as DRC with only difference that > cache is saved to a file and what would we normally call "runtime" is simply just a > process of static recompilation taking some time. Makes sense?
Something about the post above tickled a memory of mine. See if you can spot the similarity (hint: it's at the end of the post in both cases).
Previous 
Index 
Next 
Flat 
Re: Emulator: Interpreter vs. Compiler?
Reply
Re: It's called "static recompiler"
