MAMEWorld Forums - The Loony Bin - Re: S**t the New King James version is out, why wasnt I told!!!!????

> >
> > Details change but the premise doesn't.
> >
>
> What is a theory without proof or details? nothing more than an idea and that's it.
> you must have details to base your theory upon.

Science is about making sense of things by trying to figure things out based on what we have already figured out in the past and revising it when new things come to light. Religion is about making sense of things based on ancient story books. If you want to believe fossils are fake and carbon dating and other element dating is all bullshit then you are free to, but you don't have your facts straight about the arguments people are saying, is all I'm saying. I'm not saying that I personally know the history of the earth for fact.

> >
> > You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. Once you get into the hundreds of
> > millions of years, adding or subtracting some is pretty minor of a detail. It's
> still
> > an argument of a few hundred million years vs. 6,000. That hasn't changed so
> > basically you have no point here.
>
> actually going from 400 thousand to 4.5 billion is quite alot .

It's like I said, for a long time an argument that it's millions of years old vs. 6,000. You're now changing your numbers around too.

> > Again this is very minor and nothing to do with the evolution vs. religion bases.
> It
> > doesn't matter what their skin was like. The argument is whether they existed at
> all
> > (evolutionists say) or whether their bones were created when the earth was inside
> the
> > ground to later test people's faith in religion.
> >
>
> point is even evolutionists can't even agree and they are the so-called "experts"
> on evolution...

Some of them don't agree on details. It doesn't matter.

> > > and then though mankind into the mix and it gets even more split. Funny thing
> > > is most stuff still taught today in science books is LIES. they still talk and
> > > show lucy the walking monkey but IT'S FAKE!! that's a proven fact. the embro
> chart
> > > by Ernst Haeckel still in science book's today is a FAKE and that was proven
> > > years ago http://www.truthinscience.org.uk/site/content/view/210/63/ and on and
> > > on.
> >
> > I don't know/care about this.
>
> but this is the MOST important part of evolution (mans origins).

Lucy the walking monkey is the most important part of evolution/science vs. religion discussions?

> > > I can go on and on about the "problems" with evolution. Nothing to do with
> > > GOD or religion it has to do with the FACT that evolutionists are teaching
> > > just as many false doctrines as you blame the church of doing.
> >
> > The theories are evolving. Even the "law" of gravity might go up in smoke. It's
> about
> > figuring stuff out the best we can.
>
> Agree it is changing but to just pretend that there is not other way that anything
> could exist other than what some one says is sad. world was flat hundreds of yrs ago
> good thing someone thought that the scientists of the times were wrong and went to
> find out on their own.

I agree.

> > You say that like they know things they "push" are false before they say it, like
> > they are dastardly or something, and that's ridiculous.
>
> that my friend is the whole point, the embryo chart was known to be false by the man
> that
> drew it. Lucy was known to be false by the dr who put her together to "present his
> find to the world". answer one question just the 2 examples I have given here, the
> chart
> and lucy (I can present more) are proven false and been known false for over a decade
> then why are they still presented into science books today that are used in schools,
> why
> are they still presented in major museums? if only for a reference then why no
> disclaimer
> with either the text books or the museums?

Personally I'm in favor of science evolution and not the theory of evolution. Darwin certainly had some "best guesses" that he had to use, though I've never even read his book. Surely there are a few quacks on either side with "Lucy" stories. Like multiplying fish.