> > well someone (not me) seemed to think it was worthwhile otherwise the chips would
> > have been donated and it would not be on the list.
> > If it doesn't need doing I can easily remove them from the list. Just confirm. 100%
> > confirm.
> Well, now that we understand how it works better (not nearly well enough, but
> better), we're pretty sure it is a "simple" interpreter baked into a gate array. No
> mcu in practice, which sucks, it would have been way simpler...
ok. I figured the larger one near the CPU (no Toshiba gate array numbers) was something more important but for now I'll mark them as 'not needed'