> I have just looked at the source change.
> http://mess.dorando.at/svn/?rev=14586
>
> I really do not want to sound rude but putting an url in the source code isn't really
> a good idea and should be avoided if possible. In the grand scheme of things the
> source should last, while the url not. I hate the idea that 100 years from now the
> source could be full of 404 hyperlinks, just saying...
>
> And while I appreciate you provide informations about that set, you may have been a
> bit too verbose about it. Speaking at first person should be avoided. Plus it's not
> really necessary to put your signature in the source, the change logs exist for that
> purpose.
Urls are checked periodically in source, so it should not be a concern you should worry yourself about. I was the one who submitted the initial dump and given it was not working as the other and there were uncertainty as to the source, I felt it vital to let whomever will work on it know the exact details for the dump, so I added some of the discussion and the link. This was one week ago. Fast forward to today, we now have a booting and working image which has been added, so this dialog is not needed anymore and will be summarily stripped or deleted entirely.
Please don't start drama where none exists.. external micromanagement is not appreciated. Thank you.
|
Index 
Flat 
I hope you are DONE!
Reply
Area 51 Site 4 .CHD
