> The MAME and MESS name are not going anywhere. There is too much brand awareness, at > least with MAME, to just discard them for something even less meaningless.
Indeed the names shouldn't go anywhere. MAME is the name to keep (for everything). I know people that don't go far from clicking "start" on their Windows that do know MAME. (btw none of them knows MESS - which is a pity)
> Nothing that Haze says represents either the MAME or MESS team, as he is not part of > either one.
Point being? I don't think he tried to talk as part of any of the two teams (still as an external viewer I don't get the "closed circle" that you call "team" as Haze clearly DOES contribute to both projects, correct?).
> UME is like misfitmame. Which is ironic as universal machine emulator does not > include sets supported by misfitmame.
No it is not like misfitMAME. UME plain and simple, is a single exe for MAME and MESS with AFAIK the same compile flags as the two separate official compiles. Why you present it as something else?
MESSUNI could possibly be identified as some kind of misfitMAME, as it is a very specific build.
Index 
Flat 
Re: UME - Unified Machine Emulator
Reply
Re: UME - Unified Machine Emulator
