> > BTW note (speaking as someone that has been part of teams and has led teams) that > you > > correctly say "unable to interact fruitfully" - stress on word "interact" (which is > a > > "both ways" word). > > He's just passive agressive. So he can scream and shout all he wants, but gets upset > real quick if you disagree. He's like a high maintenance girlfriend, without any of > the benefits.
Man I don't care about Haze's character. It is not the point.
Maybe he is the worse person to work with. Maybe not and the team has too many stubborn people as I think he believes from what I've read in his (public) posts. The point is if merging is any good. Turning this into a Haze discussion just leads me (as someone who reads this) to lean towards his "stubborn team" claims.
Again I don't care about this either way. I care if merge is on the table and if not, if there are any valid arguments for that. Things that your "private discussions" as a team have proven. In that case, do tell us please.