> > Haze has made it clear that he won't ever relicense code that he wrote, so coming up > with a statement for him is pointless.
I didn't get this impression from reading his blog entries. I think at some point he said he'd probably relent as a final selfless act to save MAME, or something along those lines. I'd find a quote from him, but I can't since he's taken down most of the blog entries. I personally think it could be useful to find a way to relicense code without requiring him to claim copyright over code when he's not convinced he has the right to do so.
As for the rest, I'm not sure at this point we have any disagreement that extends beyond mere semantics, so I think I'll just leave it here.