> Currently, I would call it fantasy. As in the Wikipedia references "science fiction".
I asked for a name, but you merely categorized it as an abstract idea. Well, what if you were the person to invent such a contraption? Then, what would you call it?
No need to answer that one. It's just something to contemplate; and, we all know that by you answering it, you would then have to admit defeat. Simply because there is only one, logical answer. Give the Devil (its) due.
> > I already stated my thoughts on the Jetsons' thing. It's not a car. Not in any way. >
In your_opinion™. eta: I wouldn't pigeon hole it as a "car" exclusively, just a TYPE of car. And that's MY opinion.
> But I know someone will want to chime in again and say that it has a carriage for > passengers... So does a submarine. It's not a fucking car.
Wait, I thought we were discussing flying cars. Now you have to go an introduce fucking cars? Warning: possibly NSFW. j/k
I'll just leave this here. You said I was wrong about the "I couldn't care less" phrase. You say that I, or anyone else is wrong about flying cars. Therefore, I'm confident that that alone settles this dispute.