> > That's are positive response right? In that things will improve? > > > > Apologies if I don't understand as I don't follow development of MAME too much from > a > > software engineer standpoint. > > Things will improve in that the ridiculous macros that cause system definitions to > not fit in any reasonably sized window will be replaced with something better and > easier to understand. You're probably not going to get a tag telling you that a > machine is or isn't a coin-operated electronic video game designed for public use.
Probably not is better than not. I live in hope! I would just define it as "Arcade" but there is obviously a plan behind what appears to be madness!
I support you guys all the way. Just my opinion for what its worth and I would not say I am dumb would be to provide some extra "documentation" around what is what (what is the machine). It meets the project goal and ticks all the boxes. I would also suggest a new project name and describing the new goals of the project. Its obviously not an Arcade Emulator anymore. What exactly is it? Or maybe the two siblings MAME and MESS need a parent?
Index 
Flat 
Re: Mame 162 -listxml
Reply
