> Eurogamer article bringing up performance issues as well as a little
> behind-the-scenes failed agreement to use Retroarch. In short, apparently Sega wanted
> RA to relicense under MIT among other things- pretty much an impossibility. Think
> when MAME relicensed, but instead with most contributors firmly against the new
> license (from what the RA developer said, for good reason).
> Sega releases classic games on mobile, for free, but at what cost?
I can't see how a relicensing of RA would have changed anything. RA is only a frontend for other emulators which would have kept their licensing scheme.