> If that is to be true, will you also bring back interlaced content for systems, where > it is already throw out? I remember discussions, where the conclusion was, "no one > use a CRT anymore and it is to hard to maintain", but in this case here you will do > it???
Yes. I was not a part of that discussion mind you.
> As we are at audio examples: It is like capturing a WAV from a lousy 128kb mp3 file > with decent audio equipment and 192khz AD converters and expect a better result vs. > just do a 320kb mp3 of it again. Both could be transfered back again to a CD/DVD.
Um no it is not like that at all actually. I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.