> what's really sad is the idea Haze has of discussions, as it emerges clearly from his > blog (but it was the same 2 years ago when he tried to force the merging of MESS with > MAME, and other times too): 9 posts over its blog in a week, iterating over and over > its point of view, refusing to acknowledge other's arguments, not allowing replies > from the people he attacks, closing comments when counterarguments are shown. > basically either you worship him, or you have no right to highlight any weak point in > his arguments. Haze-land sounds a lot like a dictatorship to me...
I was thinking it's a rather strange way to communicate. He posts to his blog, everyone comes here to discuss what he said, then he makes another post which clearly shows he's reading what goes on here. It would seem to make sense just to come here and have the discussion directly. I know he was banned at one point, but I'm pretty sure he's since been invited back.