MAMEWorld >> News
View all threads Index   Flat Mode Flat  

TafoidAdministrator
I keep on testing.. testing.. testing... into the future!
Reged: 04/18/06
Posts: 3142
Loc: USA
Send PM
Re: MAME 0.149
06/12/13 03:38 PM


> Also broken here (Slackware Linux 13.37):
>
> bash-4.1# make -j9 all
> Compiling src/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.c...
> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> In file included from src/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.c0:
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc: In member function 'void
> hd6309_device::execute_one()':
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> In file included from src/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.c0:
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc78: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc78: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc78: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc57: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc79: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc79: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc79: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc79: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc78: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> make: *** [obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.o] Error 1

I'm told that if you apply Arbee's "line ending" patch HERE, this should not happen.







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* MAME 0.149 abelenki 06/11/13 07:06 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Cyberzinho Punk  06/13/13 01:28 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Cyberzinho Punk  06/11/13 11:06 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 TafoidAdministrator  06/12/13 03:38 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 flamuss  06/12/13 10:23 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 R. Belmont  06/13/13 12:00 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Janez  06/13/13 12:23 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 R. Belmont  06/13/13 03:10 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 flamuss  06/13/13 03:38 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 R. Belmont  06/13/13 04:02 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 flamuss  06/14/13 03:50 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Anonymous  06/14/13 11:10 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 R. Belmont  06/14/13 10:42 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 H@P  06/25/13 02:26 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Vas Crabb  06/14/13 07:05 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Rockman  06/11/13 06:13 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 B2K24  06/11/13 01:35 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) TafoidAdministrator  06/11/13 10:59 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) joey35car  06/11/13 12:49 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) TafoidAdministrator  06/11/13 01:14 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) joey35car  06/11/13 01:39 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) Traso  06/12/13 03:12 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) CiroConsentino  06/12/13 05:21 AM
. * build non 64bits = Crash (same as mess) xibic  06/11/13 08:58 AM
. * Re: build non 64bits = Crash (same as mess) RobbbertModerator  06/11/13 10:44 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Ramirez  06/11/13 08:12 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Spyder  06/11/13 08:02 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Spyder  06/12/13 06:33 AM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  John IV, Robbbert, Tafoid 
1 registered and 280 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 6642