MAMEWorld >> EmuChat
View all threads Index   Flat Mode Flat  

Anonymous
Unregistered
Re: Neat try, but not really comparable.
04/22/13 12:01 PM


> Given enough time, it'll come up with a
> serviceable SMB1 run to completion, but I wouldn't call it even remotely comparable
> to even what a non-specialist speedrunner could do with the most basic tricks you
> learn by playing.

The only point it learns is when you train it what bytes are important by playing the game. So if you fed it a speed run then it might learn different rules.

Otherwise the only way to get it to play better is to make the search longer.

But the fact that it can actually learn to play it at all is the impressive thing, that it exploits the stomping at the top of a jump is cute but no more impressive.







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis italieAdministrator 04/15/13 02:07 AM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis Bryan Ischo  04/22/13 09:53 PM
. * Okay Debbi Downer... italieAdministrator  04/23/13 02:11 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... Bryan Ischo  04/23/13 02:27 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... DMala  04/23/13 07:27 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... Bryan Ischo  04/23/13 08:36 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... Anonymous  04/25/13 04:53 PM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... R. Belmont  04/23/13 08:05 PM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... RetroRepair  04/25/13 03:06 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... DMala  04/25/13 06:26 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... Tomu Breidah  04/23/13 05:00 AM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis DMala  04/15/13 05:10 AM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis R. Belmont  04/15/13 06:14 PM
. * Neat try, but not really comparable. Firehawke  04/16/13 04:40 AM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/22/13 12:01 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. GatKong  04/23/13 08:38 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Bryan Ischo  04/24/13 09:50 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/30/13 07:45 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Olivier Galibert  04/30/13 03:23 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/28/13 12:34 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. R. Belmont  04/25/13 04:52 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Vas Crabb  04/26/13 03:31 AM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/28/13 12:37 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. italieAdministrator  04/28/13 03:55 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/29/13 04:12 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. R. Belmont  04/29/13 05:07 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/29/13 06:23 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Vas Crabb  04/29/13 07:26 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/30/13 03:30 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis StilettoAdministrator  04/15/13 08:25 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis Anonymous  04/15/13 11:16 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis StilettoAdministrator  04/15/13 11:27 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis R. Belmont  04/16/13 05:28 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis Tomu Breidah  04/15/13 04:26 AM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  Robbbert, Tafoid 
0 registered and 22 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 2655