|
|
Re: New CPU, Epic Mame performance..
06/30/14 09:50 PM
|
|
|
> Figured it out..thanx to anyone that helped:
>
> All run on 141 64bit for an apples to apples comparison, unless of course it being
> run on windows 8 changes things..don't think it does???
>
>
>
> Yeah..some weird results, scud & gradius4 were much faster, whilst propcycle &
> radikalb were 10-20% slower at the same 4.8Ghz 4770K, is hyperthreading kicking in???
>
>
> Dolphin I ran in a separate test as the cmd window fills with error codes as it runs,
> but does give a result of 56.
>
> I will do some further benchmarks on Mame 153 64bit to see the difference.
>
> BTW...4.8Ghz on 1.25 volts, EPIC chip.
>
>
> EDIT: Mame 153 results
>
>
> Wow!!!...slower or what.
Can you put all that data into columns, instead? It would be a little more organized for a direct comparison of mame versions.
"Note to Noobs:
We are glad to help you but simply posting that something does not work is not going to lead to you getting help. The more information you can supply defining your problem, the less likely it will be that you will get smart-alec replies.
C.D.~"
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: New CPU, Epic Mame performance..
Reply
