MAMEWorld Forums - The Loony Bin - Re: S**t the New King James version is out, why wasnt I told!!!!????

>
> Details change but the premise doesn't.
>

What is a theory without proof or details? nothing more than an idea and that's it.
you must have details to base your theory upon.

>
> You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. Once you get into the hundreds of
> millions of years, adding or subtracting some is pretty minor of a detail. It's still
> an argument of a few hundred million years vs. 6,000. That hasn't changed so
> basically you have no point here.

actually going from 400 thousand to 4.5 billion is quite alot .

>
> Again this is very minor and nothing to do with the evolution vs. religion bases. It
> doesn't matter what their skin was like. The argument is whether they existed at all
> (evolutionists say) or whether their bones were created when the earth was inside the
> ground to later test people's faith in religion.
>

point is even evolutionists can't even agree and they are the so-called "experts"
on evolution...

> > and then though mankind into the mix and it gets even more split. Funny thing
> > is most stuff still taught today in science books is LIES. they still talk and
> > show lucy the walking monkey but IT'S FAKE!! that's a proven fact. the embro chart
> > by Ernst Haeckel still in science book's today is a FAKE and that was proven
> > years ago http://www.truthinscience.org.uk/site/content/view/210/63/ and on and
> > on.
>
> I don't know/care about this.

but this is the MOST important part of evolution (mans origins).

> > I can go on and on about the "problems" with evolution. Nothing to do with
> > GOD or religion it has to do with the FACT that evolutionists are teaching
> > just as many false doctrines as you blame the church of doing.
>
> The theories are evolving. Even the "law" of gravity might go up in smoke. It's about
> figuring stuff out the best we can.

Agree it is changing but to just pretend that there is not other way that anything
could exist other than what some one says is sad. world was flat hundreds of yrs ago
good thing someone thought that the scientists of the times were wrong and went to
find out on their own.

>
> You say that like they know things they "push" are false before they say it, like
> they are dastardly or something, and that's ridiculous.

that my friend is the whole point, the embryo chart was known to be false by the man that
drew it. Lucy was known to be false by the dr who put her together to "present his
find to the world". answer one question just the 2 examples I have given here, the chart
and lucy (I can present more) are proven false and been known false for over a decade
then why are they still presented into science books today that are used in schools, why
are they still presented in major museums? if only for a reference then why no disclaimer
with either the text books or the museums?

Only here to annoy...