|
|
Re: Glowing Effect In MAME
11/13/12 07:31 PM
|
|
|
> Regardless, it's not a Fermi (GTX4xx) or Kepler (GTX5xx) part, both of which have
> orders of magnitude more shader FLOPs than the 8xxx/9xxx/1xx/2xx/3xx (all of which
> are the same architecture with minor process tweeks).
It's an old card and you shouldn't expect too much, but according to gallium3d they aren't the same.
8600 is nv84
http://feedback.wildfiregames.com/report/opengl/device/Gallium%200.4%20on%20NV84
gtx 260 is nva0
http://feedback.wildfiregames.com/report/opengl/device/Gallium%200.4%20on%20NVA0
http://feedback.wildfiregames.com/report...ium+0.4+on+NVA0
http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/CodeNames
They are similar as they are both NV50, but it's not just a rebranding like they do with the mobile chips. While these aren't all exactly the same, they are all NV92. Marketing sucks.
GeForce 8800 (GT, GS, GTS 512, M GTS, M GTX)
GeForce 9600 GSO, 9800 (GT, GTX, GTX+, GX2, M GT, M GTX)
GeForce GTS 150(M), GTS 160M, GTS 240, GTS 250, GTX (260M, 280M, 285M), GT (330, 340)
Quadro FX (2800M, 3600M, 3700, 3700M, 3800M, 4700 X2), VX 200
Edited by smf (11/13/12 07:43 PM)
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Glowing Effect In MAME
Reply
