MAMEWorld >> The Loony Bin
View all threads Index   Flat Mode Flat  

SmitdoggAdministrator
Reged: 09/18/03
Posts: 16877
Send PM
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
02/16/13 06:22 AM


It's the pace. Don't get me wrong, even if that was fixed and new stories flowed it would still not be Star Trek, but OMG the pace! The pace makes me want to kill!






Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator 02/16/13 05:56 AM
. * As much as you want to like it, the whole thing goes on WAY too long, every episode, all the way through. TriggerFin  02/16/13 04:35 PM
. * Re: As much as you want to like it, the whole thing goes on WAY too long, every episode, all the way through. italieAdministrator  02/16/13 05:00 PM
. * Re: As much as you want to like it, the whole thing goes on WAY too long, every episode, all the way through. SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 04:45 PM
. * An hour a week, or less. (nt) TriggerFin  02/16/13 11:53 PM
. * Re: As much as you want to like it, the whole thing goes on WAY too long, every episode, all the way through. igamabob  02/16/13 06:23 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? yaggy  02/16/13 04:11 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 04:16 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? italieAdministrator  02/16/13 05:15 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? DMala  02/16/13 06:14 AM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 06:22 AM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? italieAdministrator  02/16/13 07:49 AM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 03:31 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? italieAdministrator  02/16/13 03:52 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 03:54 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? italieAdministrator  02/16/13 03:59 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 04:11 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? italieAdministrator  02/16/13 04:59 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 05:01 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? italieAdministrator  02/16/13 05:16 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 05:18 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? krick  02/16/13 06:45 PM
. * NT course SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 06:47 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? italieAdministrator  02/16/13 05:27 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? DMala  02/17/13 07:38 AM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator  02/18/13 03:31 PM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? *=/STARRIDER\=*  02/16/13 06:01 AM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? SmitdoggAdministrator  02/16/13 06:20 AM
. * Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out? italieAdministrator  02/16/13 06:18 AM
. * I don't know what that means! nt *=/STARRIDER\=*  02/16/13 07:07 AM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  GatKong 
0 registered and 132 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 3648