News Ultimarc Emu Loader Programming MAME Artwork progetto-SNAPS MAMEUI HBMAME EmuChat Hardware The Loony Bin MAME Artwork X

Entrance | Main Index | Search | New user | Login | Who's Online | FAQ | Rules

MAMEWorld >> EmuChat Index   Flat

R. Belmont Cuckoo for IGAvania Reged: 09/21/03 Posts: 9714 Loc: ECV-197 The Orville Send PM Re: Can it beat t7z though? 10/11/16 07:25 PM Reply > Also CHDs is what consumes the most out of everything these days. That would probably > be better served if CHDs could inherit from each other like VDI/VHD files do with x86 > virtual machines. CHDs *can* inherit from each other. The Virtual PC VHD file and MAME CHD were invented by the same person, after all (note the similar acronyms). It's just not worthwhile savings for the arcade games we support at the present time. I do think once we get serious about software lists for e.g. Windows 95 that we'll want a base parent Win95 install and various games and apps will be child CHDs that overlay an install of that item on top of the base OS install.

Entire thread Subject Posted by Posted on worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard RdW 10/04/16 08:22 PM Can it beat t7z though? Dullaron  10/09/16 11:03 AM Re: Can it beat t7z though? lharms  10/10/16 08:29 AM Re: Can it beat t7z though? R. Belmont  10/11/16 07:25 PM Re: Can it beat t7z though? lharms  10/12/16 01:36 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Roman  10/04/16 09:26 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard RdW  10/05/16 10:33 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard R. Belmont  10/06/16 04:54 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Tafoid  10/05/16 11:03 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Haze  10/05/16 10:47 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Master O  10/05/16 01:57 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Smitdogg  10/05/16 02:15 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard smf  10/06/16 01:50 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Haze  10/05/16 03:08 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Master O  10/05/16 03:22 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Haze  10/05/16 03:28 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard MooglyGuy  10/05/16 09:34 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Haze  10/05/16 09:31 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard R. Belmont  10/06/16 05:04 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Traso  10/05/16 06:44 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard MooglyGuy  10/05/16 07:55 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Traso  10/09/16 02:51 AM

Extra information Permissions Moderator:  Robbbert, Tafoid  1 registered and 193 anonymous users are browsing this forum. You cannot start new topics You cannot reply to topics HTML is enabled UBBCode is enabled Thread views: 2544

Browser Test | Delete Cookies atom-guru atom-guru atom-guru atom-guru UBB.threads™ 6.3.2