> Valerie is black. Her "not appearing to have any Negroid features" (fuck me, did you > actually write that?) doesn't change the fact that she's black. Go look up a picture > of her daughter Laura while you're at it. (Nevermind... you'll probably just think > she's "really tan.") >
No. She does look to be.... some percentage of black (and very pretty I might add). I wouldn't say she's full black. So, am I to gather that if anyone is any % of whatever race, if some remark is used towards them that would fit a racial slur against that micro percentage of race, then it means the person that said that is absolutely a racist, even if they were completely unaware of that race in said person's heritage? Why can't they be an equally tiny amount of racist?
> > Please... I read it with zero preconceptions when it first happened... first thing I > thought was "fuckin' racist piece of shit." > > But I guess, since the MSM (is that a buzzword?) agrees with a bunch of individuals > who also feel the same way, it must be a conspiracy to bring Roseanne down, not > actually racist, right? >
I was skeptical at first (you know, because the MSM is SOOO trustworthy ), so that's why I researched it... You know, looked up a picture of what Valerie Jarratt actually looks like. So that's why I couldn't understand why people were crying "wacist".
> > > > Yes. I've seen it. I get what they're "saying". But what everyone seems to have > their > > fingers in their ears and saying "La-la-la-la-la-la-la!" about is the fact that > > nothing racist was ever said. And therefor, them saying "we're firing her because > she > > said something racist" is horseshit. > > *** Tom puts fingers in his own ears *** > > "Nothing racist was ever said, because I, Tom, have dutifully concluded that nothing > racist was ever said. Because I said so. That's why." > > *** Tom continues on "La-la... la-la-la-la-ing" to Smurfs theme, skipping down the > street *** > > Yup... I'm just feeding the troll by now. >
You just pulled an "I know you are, but what am I?"
Yeah, you should've stopped a long time ago. But thanks for the laugh.
> > You don't believe it was racist. The whole of MAMEWorld could come down here and > disagree with you, and you would STILL believe you are right.
My points have apparently caused you to be uncomfortable, even doubting your own comments (that you had to delete your original post), and resorting to childish tactics. I'm sure you're aware of Cognitive dissonance, right?
Index 
Flat 
Re: PC thought police strike again
Reply
), so that's why I researched it... You know, looked up a picture of what Valerie Jarratt actually looks like. So that's why I couldn't understand why people were crying "wacist".
