John IV |
|
IV/Play, MAME, MAMEUI
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/22/03
|
|
Posts: 1967
|
|
Loc: Washington, USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
[Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
#250873 - 04/05/11 05:44 AM
|
|
|
2011.04.04 Warning: MameUI .142 is being released but it is still taking 1.2GB in memory when loaded, this is compared to 215MB of .141.
The x86 version may crash out if used w/out sufficient resources. The DEVs continue to investigate, feel free to help out if you spot something in the code in the meantime.
http://www.mameui.info/
|
john iv
http://www.mameui.info/
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: John IV]
#250889 - 04/05/11 09:49 AM
|
|
|
Will test it immediately, I'll tell you what occurs on my PC in a few.
Thx John...
-----
OK just launched it, as you said, longer to load, it takes here 1 111 168 K in memory, just the user interface, no games loaded...
Trying to launch Metal Slug : Launched OK, not long, but 1 250 664 K in memory.. running smooth...
Just quitted the game, memory got back to 1 128 740 K (higher than just after launch)
Tried to launch Metal Slug 3, memory error...
Relaunch Metal Slug, np, and quit : 1 130 364 K, again higher.. :/
My specs: MAME32 x86, Windows Vista 32bits SP2, Intel Core 2 Duo CPU P7750 @ 2.26GHz 2.27GHz with 4 Go of memory...
Well i'm aware that it won't help, but just to confirm..
Regards, MAMu_
Edited by MAMu_ (04/05/11 10:05 AM)
|
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: John IV]
#250899 - 04/05/11 01:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anybody try running Purify? -NT
[Re: John IV]
#250915 - 04/05/11 07:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
| AnimalBear |
|
100% MAME Fan Forever!
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 04/29/10
|
|
Posts: 206
|
|
Loc: Portugal, Porto
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: AntoPISA]
#250916 - 04/05/11 07:40 PM
|
|
|
Open Mame UI i have 67% Memory closed 38% equals 29% it's a lot compared with the u3 version. MALA only 2% memory to play the DOS\Win Version.
Please people becarefull. I will use MALA until the problem is fixed.
|
|
|
| redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: AnimalBear]
#250929 - 04/05/11 09:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: John IV]
#250942 - 04/05/11 11:21 PM
|
|
|
In true (I suppose) these version taking a bunch of RAM only in Windows 7 because of it's last monthly update who causes an overcharge of RAM.
|
|
|
| AnimalBear |
|
100% MAME Fan Forever!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 04/29/10
|
|
Posts: 206
|
|
Loc: Portugal, Porto
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: redk9258]
#250954 - 04/06/11 02:15 AM
|
|
|
Thanks redk9258 i can´t remember the name 
And i know the history i saw on Discovery. 
Edited by AnimalBear (04/06/11 02:17 AM)
|
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: KyoS2Tohru]
#250959 - 04/06/11 02:42 AM
|
|
|
> In true (I suppose) these version taking a bunch of RAM only in Windows 7 because of
> it's last monthly update who causes an overcharge of RAM.
See my answers and specs, same under vista, not a windows 7 issue... at least I don't think so.
|
|
|
| redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: MAMu_]
#250962 - 04/06/11 03:13 AM
|
|
|
I would think if it were a Windows issue, it would show it's ugly, memory hogging head using MAMEUI 141u3.
|
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: redk9258]
#251200 - 04/07/11 10:50 PM
|
|
|
> I would think if it were a Windows issue, it would show it's ugly, memory hogging
> head using MAMEUI 141u3.
MAMEUI takes a good ten second to load on my P4 2.8ghz since the last couple/few revisions.
|
Consider it high comedy....sincere tragedy....whatever...don't take it personally.
The Culture
|
|
Tafoid |
|
I keep on testing.. testing.. testing... into the future!
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 04/19/06
|
|
Posts: 3135
|
|
Loc: USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: mogli]
#251204 - 04/07/11 10:56 PM
|
|
|
> > I would think if it were a Windows issue, it would show it's ugly, memory hogging
> > head using MAMEUI 141u3.
>
> MAMEUI takes a good ten second to load on my P4 2.8ghz since the last couple/few
> revisions.
Likely the influx of all the mechanical games in 0.141u1 - it bumped the total game level at least a thousand. More gamee, more data == slower startup.
|
|
|
| John IV |
|
IV/Play, MAME, MAMEUI
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/22/03
|
|
Posts: 1967
|
|
Loc: Washington, USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: Tafoid]
#251258 - 04/08/11 07:39 AM
|
|
|
It's also the memory issue, it's 4-5x beyond the prior load time as things are iterated into memory.
As far as my non-programming understanding goes from listening to Aaron and Micko it's something to do w/ the memory allocation for driver options on each driver being 100K and the destructor is not clearing it (?) if the option is already in the list.
|
john iv
http://www.mameui.info/
|
|
| Nomax |
|
Ryo Hazuki
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 11/19/03
|
|
Posts: 496
|
|
Loc: Belgium
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: [Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
[Re: redk9258]
#251861 - 04/15/11 12:08 PM
|
|
|
> Dude, it's not DOS. It's a command prompt. DOS has not been in Windows since Windows
> 98.
> http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/history
Indeed it's a DOS prompt in modern Windows.
But their "Geek trivia: Windows 98 is the last version based on MS‑DOS." is bullshit.
Windows Me was still based on MS-DOS although they tried to hide that fact by removing the files needed for booting DOS in text mode. This was possible by copying those files from a Windows 98 CD though.
|
--------------------
NPlayers.ini - The multiplayer description file for MAME. (Linux user #448789)
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
[Annc] MameUI32/64 .142 released. Warning.
Reply
[Re: 
