|
MAMEUI Unstable Repository
#294344 - 08/23/12 08:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
| redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: AntoPISA]
#294356 - 08/23/12 10:54 PM
|
|
|
Why is it titled unstable? If you feel it is unstable, why bother archiving it? 
|
|
|
| Sune |
|
Connected
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 5648
|
|
Loc: Lagoa Santa, Brasil
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: redk9258]
#294359 - 08/23/12 11:31 PM
|
|
|
> Why is it titled unstable? If you feel it is unstable, why bother archiving it?
I'm guessing the "u" in 141u1 means "unstable" to him.
I always read it as "update".
S
|
|
|
Stiletto |
|
They're always after me Lucky ROMS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 03/07/04
|
|
Posts: 6472
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: Sune]
#294360 - 08/23/12 11:35 PM
|
|
|
> > Why is it titled unstable? If you feel it is unstable, why bother archiving it?
>
> I'm guessing the "u" in 141u1 means "unstable" to him.
>
> I always read it as "update".
>
> S
I thought originally it was "µ" for "micro-update" but became "u"...
I forget...
- Stiletto
|
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: redk9258]
#294362 - 08/23/12 11:52 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Why is it titled unstable? If you feel it is unstable, why bother archiving it?
I will be a romantic, but that's pure spirit of conservation.
In my opinion, everything about this wonderful world and priceless NOT to be missed ...
|
Site: https://www.progettosnaps.net/
Board: progetto-SNAPS Official Board
Twitter: @progettosnaps
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: redk9258]
#294371 - 08/24/12 02:17 AM
|
|
|
> Why is it titled unstable? If you feel it is unstable, why bother archiving it?
Educated guess:
That site could also possibly be helpful in quashing bugs since there would be a place you could get old MAMES from?
|
"Note to Noobs:
We are glad to help you but simply posting that something does not work is not going to lead to you getting help. The more information you can supply defining your problem, the less likely it will be that you will get smart-alec replies.
C.D.~"
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: redk9258]
#294397 - 08/24/12 07:57 AM
|
|
|
> Why is it titled unstable? If you feel it is unstable, why bother archiving it?
I agree that the name is incorrect but what he is doing is great.
This would have been useful to me a couple of weeks ago if I knew about it.
I have an old hdd with older builds on it I will send to you when I sort that out.
I think you should include the main updates as well.
Keep up the good work your a boss.
|
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: AntoPISA]
#294412 - 08/24/12 04:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: AntoPISA]
#294415 - 08/24/12 06:00 PM
|
|
|
Please do not distribute the old versions of 0.143u7, u8, u9. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: hap]
#294416 - 08/24/12 06:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
| redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: hap]
#294430 - 08/24/12 11:12 PM
|
|
|
> Please do not distribute the old versions of 0.143u7, u8, u9. Thanks.
Was that the versions that had the huge memory leak?
|
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: redk9258]
#294431 - 08/24/12 11:33 PM
|
|
|
Cave SH3 driver probably.
|
|
|
| redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: Reznor007]
#294434 - 08/25/12 01:01 AM
|
|
|
Oh yeah. Forgot about that.
|
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: redk9258]
#294455 - 08/25/12 03:22 PM
|
|
|
You look at the old version and rejoice speed and auditing.
After 0.142 died MAMEUI
Edited by Jacku (08/25/12 03:26 PM)
|
|
|
| redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: Jacku]
#294462 - 08/25/12 07:05 PM
|
|
|
> You look at the old version and rejoice speed and auditing.
> After 0.142 died MAMEUI
How does the speed compare to regular Windows MAME (command prompt version)?
MAME -verifyroms
EDIT: I just did an unscientific experiment. I typed MAME64 at the command prompt and started and audit. Within a few seconds I tarted an audit in MAMEUI64. The cammand prompt finshed first by a few seconds. MAMEUI continued on because it audited samples too. It was done auditing ROMS within a few seconds of the command line MAME. I think the reason this is slow is because there are so many ROMs now.
Maybe a netter idea would be to yank the audit feature out of MAMEUI and just generate a gamelist based on the ROMs that are in the ROMs folder. Use CLRMAMEPRO for auditing.
Edited by redk9258 (08/25/12 07:38 PM)
|
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: redk9258]
#294489 - 08/26/12 01:39 AM
|
|
|
I've thought that for awhile too. Why would you really need to do a full audit with a UI anyway. You can't repair anything and instead of a full audit you can either do an individual set audit or easier yet, just hit enter & see what it says is missing or loads properly. Unless the full & indy audits are so intertwined that it wouldn't work. But then MAME wouldn't work at all. It still has to know & try to load the correct roms.
Later...
|
Pessimist: Oh, this can't get any worse!
Optimist: Yes, it can!
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: AntoPISA]
#294585 - 08/27/12 02:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
| redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
|
A few old ones attached including a couple of rare i686 versions...
mame32b-035.zip
mame32b-037b9.zip
mame32b-037b10.zip
mame32b-037b11_i686.zip
mame32b-037b13.zip
mame32b-037b13_i686.zip
mame32b-037b14ou.zip
Crap, I just realized you have some of those already.
Edited by redk9258 (08/27/12 11:25 PM)
|
|
|
|
Re: MAMEUI Unstable Repository
[Re: AntoPISA]
#294659 - 08/28/12 04:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
MAMEUI Unstable Repository
Reply
[Re: 
