> Another example, Cadash supports max 4 players with linked cabinet. Please easy
> explain this case on your MAME.
this kind of linking (Cadash, Virtua Racing, etc.) will be implemented in MAME when the exe is capable to run two sessions in parallel and to make them communicate one with the other
>
> If it is not, I can't figure it out. Because many ancient games doesn't support
> multi-cabinet and works stand alone, like TMNT.
> So "Link" based on "Network" is not original function and even in the linkable game
> supported by original, it doesn't improve any linking emulation.
true. MAMEHub does a completely different thing
> What purpose does it has? For support of MAME main development?
no. it has nothing to do with MAME
> For only "enjoy playing" the game??
mainly yes. it offers an alternative to K*illera which does not violates MAME license and which does not infect your computer with viruses
> I can't find merit in CS cries if so and even I feel it is very closed to some
> illigal MAME.
no it is nowehere close to illegal MAME, as long as it does not violate any of the clauses at http://mamedev.org/legal.html
given that the source is available (for ClientServerMAME & MESS) and it does not offer any copyrighted material with the exe, why should it be illegal?
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: MAMEHub 0.2 Released
Reply
