MAMEWorld >> EmuChat
View all threads Index   Flat Mode Flat  

zambr
MAME Fanatic
Reged: 04/12/09
Posts: 144
Send PM
Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME
07/06/11 06:12 AM


> Why waste all that time and effort to fix something that wasn't broke? Just to make
> it easier on the eye?

Just to make it easier on the eye? Your joking right?

Sounds to me that you have never worked in a team dev environment, or at least appreciate the issues with a demanding large scale project.

OOP was designed mainly to standardise coding practices with the idea to re-use as much of the code as possible in an organised object based fashion.

How can that be a bad thing for a large scale and complex project such as MAME or MESS?

Where this benefits most for the existing devs, is by making the code more attractive for new devs to take part and to be able to re-use code from other sources (as already mentioned).

Edited by zambr (07/06/11 06:21 AM)







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* C versus C++ with regard to MAME mogli 07/04/11 07:09 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME byuu  07/06/11 12:14 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME AeroCityMayor  07/05/11 05:44 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME mogli  07/06/11 06:56 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 06:05 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME byuu  07/06/11 12:20 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Bryan Ischo  07/06/11 06:52 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME italieAdministrator  07/06/11 02:43 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME italieAdministrator  07/04/11 11:57 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/04/11 10:54 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME TafoidAdministrator  07/04/11 11:09 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 10:17 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME BIOS-D  07/05/11 12:26 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 03:25 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Olivier Galibert  07/05/11 10:27 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 11:52 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 02:29 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 03:42 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Heihachi_73  07/06/11 04:44 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 04:13 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 04:39 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 04:45 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME TheGuru  07/05/11 11:25 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 05:39 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME zambr  07/06/11 06:12 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 06:07 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME byuu  07/06/11 01:00 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Bryan Ischo  07/06/11 01:36 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Bryan Ischo  07/05/11 06:51 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Olivier Galibert  07/05/11 06:03 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 07:18 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Olivier Galibert  07/06/11 08:38 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 07:34 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME lharms  07/06/11 04:03 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME CrapBoardSoftware  07/04/11 10:16 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Roman  07/04/11 11:02 PM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  Robbbert, Tafoid 
0 registered and 27 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 3714