> I've always wanted to check out Atari Jaguar. When I was a kid, it was the one game
> console that was the most expensive, that had the best graphics, and not a single
> person I knew owned one. And then it died quickly and was forgotten about before I
> ever got a chance to see it in action.
>
It absolutely did not have the best graphics. Maybe magazine screenshots gave that impression, but most of the games did not look better that the average SNES game.
> So now I want to check it out since I never got a chance to when I was younger. After
> doing some research, I've read that most people prefer "Virtual Jaguar" rather than
> "Project Tempest" as their emulator of choice.
>
> So is it true that the best Atari Jaguar emulator "Virtual Jaguar"?
>
> If so, is there any need to download "Project Tempest" as well? Meaning, is there any
> particular reason or game that "Project Tempest" should be used instead of "Virtual
> Jaguar"? Any things "Project Tempest" can do that "Virtual Jaguar" can't?
You ask too many questions. Just download them both.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Virtual Jaguar vs. Project Tempest
Reply
