> I'm on deployment, so no downloading and playing with stuff for myself. Did a search
> for retroarch and the first page of results didn't exactly cover my question...
>
> How does retroarch do in comparison to MAME with regards to all the stuff that was
> merged from MESS? Not in terms of accuracy, but playability?
>
> Can I use the very same files from the most recent MAME and play them with retroarch?
>
> What does Retroarch do that MAME does not, and vice versa?
I use Retroarch when i don't have any other alternative or unsatisfying ones (for example on the GPD XD).
But emu-politics aside (even if what Haze spotted is really important), it's a very hard and counter intuitive frontend to use.
I won't see the point about using it in Windows. It has the merit to exist where nothing else exists, but the unifiyed interface is barely a point when you're so user unfriendly.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Views on Retroarch cores vs MAME (playability)
Reply
