MAMEWorld >> EmuChat
Previous thread Previous  View all threads Index   Next thread Next   Flat Mode Flat  

Sune
Connected
Reged: 09/21/03
Posts: 5648
Loc: Lagoa Santa, Brasil
Send PM
Re: How about a clock for clock comparison.
04/20/11 09:28 PM


> (...) And you are not going to get a 120 mm
> push-pull configuration in a low profile cooler. Which means that they would have to
> have a fan that is low profile but with the same heat dissipation capacity as your
> 120 mm push/pull, and such a cooling solution might add significantly to the cost of
> the Sandy Bridge chip.

I think you misunderstood, push-pull refers to case fans, one on the front (or side, if the case is big enough) sucking in air and one at the back blowing it out.

Nothing to do with the CPU cooler.

S







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont 03/06/11 12:56 AM
. * A 2500K comparison, something seems off for me. Kano11  05/31/11 03:39 PM
. * Re: A 2500K comparison, something seems off for me. John IV  05/31/11 11:59 PM
. * Re: A 2500K comparison, something seems off for me. Kano11  06/01/11 03:32 AM
. * How about a clock for clock comparison. ScottF  04/19/11 03:37 AM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. Fever  04/22/11 11:10 PM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. R. Belmont  04/19/11 06:33 AM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. Bryan Ischo  04/19/11 09:10 PM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. R. Belmont  04/19/11 10:42 PM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. Bryan Ischo  04/20/11 12:01 AM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. Sune  04/20/11 09:28 PM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. R. Belmont  04/20/11 10:25 PM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. Sune  04/20/11 11:50 PM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. R. Belmont  04/21/11 05:05 PM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. R. Belmont  04/20/11 12:18 AM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. AaronGiles  04/20/11 12:55 AM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. R. Belmont  04/20/11 02:58 AM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. Bryan Ischo  04/20/11 01:04 AM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. ScottF  04/19/11 03:46 PM
. * Re: How about a clock for clock comparison. R. Belmont  04/19/11 08:52 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Master O  03/09/11 05:56 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz TrevEB  03/07/11 10:05 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/07/11 05:42 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Anonymous  03/07/11 05:49 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/07/11 07:35 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz redk9258  03/07/11 10:22 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Moose  03/09/11 04:31 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz redk9258  03/09/11 04:47 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz CrapBoardSoftware  03/07/11 08:10 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/07/11 09:11 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Foxhack  03/08/11 07:18 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz redk9258  03/08/11 08:26 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz redk9258  03/06/11 09:00 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/06/11 12:50 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Master O  03/06/11 10:46 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/07/11 12:51 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz redk9258  03/07/11 01:59 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Bryan Ischo  03/07/11 04:50 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz redk9258  03/07/11 07:13 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Bryan Ischo  03/07/11 10:06 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/07/11 03:57 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Bryan Ischo  03/07/11 07:30 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/07/11 07:43 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Firehawke  03/06/11 08:14 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Karasu  03/06/11 05:20 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz John IV  03/06/11 02:56 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz casm  03/06/11 02:51 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/06/11 04:04 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz casm  03/06/11 05:24 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Naoki  03/06/11 02:09 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/06/11 04:05 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Naoki  03/06/11 01:33 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Ziggy100  03/06/11 01:48 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/06/11 04:30 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Firehawke  03/07/11 01:04 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Heihachi_73  03/06/11 05:40 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Naoki  03/06/11 07:36 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Anonymous  03/14/11 09:55 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz R. Belmont  03/15/11 03:24 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz RetroLover  04/20/11 01:48 PM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Bryan Ischo  03/15/11 04:20 AM
. * Re: MAME benched on Sandy Bridge @ 4.8 GHz Naoki  03/14/11 11:14 PM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  Robbbert, Tafoid 
0 registered and 117 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 6694