> > What was the explanation for Tokio / Scramble Formation? > > https://github.com/mamedev/mame/commit/aaff5c704783fae18edac646f2d242a66439013a > > IIRC the cover story there was that a board had turned up where the protection bit > wasn't set on the MCU. It's happened before, it'll likely happen again. By that point > Lord Nightmare had talked everyones ears off about the potential for 68705 science > experiments but we didn't know if he was actually going to do them.
I'm very amused by this response. But keep in mind, if you analyze the dump you will see the lock bits are set true. Or that it contains data which cannot be read through standard methods (bootstrap). Who supplied the cover story?
> No accusations have been made. I'm just waiting for you to prove you have this stuff > dumped. Announcements of having something ready to hand over and then that item never > surfacing are, as I've said, an unfortunate staple of the hobby.
You're really contradicting yourself here. You're stating this entire post is fake until somehow proven otherwise. The bouncing balls and scramble formation dumps are fake?
Index 
Flat 
Re: The Return of the Japump
Reply
